Abstract:
Current medical therapy of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
(HCM) is tailored to relieve symptoms of exercise intolerance, angina
or syncope. In recent years new concepts in the pathophysiology of
HCM have evolved. These concepts underlie our medical therapy and
will be discussed first in this review. Subsequently, the agents available
for the medical treatment of HCM are discussed along with a practical
strategy for rapid medical reduction of outflow gradients. The mechanism
of benefit of negative inotropes for obstruction is described. Newer
agents under investigation are discussed. Finally, antiarrhythmic
therapy for troubling atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are discussed
Introduction
New understanding of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) pathophysiology
form the basis for its medical treatment(1-3). Patients with HCM
have diastolic dysfunction due to hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis.
Though increased LV diastolic pressures are often present in HCM,
exercise limitation has been shown to correlate with an inability
to increase cardiac output with exercise (4). Impaired coronary
flow reserve has been shown by various modalities - coronary sinus
lactate production, Doppler intracoronary ultrasound and positron
emission tomography. The decrease in flow reserve is thought to
be the etiology of myocardial ischemia and chest pain (5). Limited
flow reserve is likely to have several causes. It may be due to
the hypertrophy itself and diastolic dysfunction, or phasic compression
"milking" of intramural coronaries in systole and early diastole,
or dynamic coronary bridges, or non-atherosclerotic occlusive disease
of the intramural coronary arteries. Syncope can occur due to intraventricular
obstruction, ventricular arrhythmias, atrial arrhythmias, heart
block or inappropriate vasodilatation that can paradoxically occur
during or after exertion.
All of these symptoms may occur in the absence of intraventricular
obstruction. Obstruction occurs in only roughly a quarter of HCM
patients. However, in addition to these other abnormalities, obstruction
may cause enough symptoms to cause the patient to seek medical attention.
Obstruction, increases systolic left ventricular pressure, systolic
wall tension and myocardial work. Coronary perfusion pressure is
decreased as aortic diastolic pressure falls and left ventricular
diastolic pressure rises. Pacing produced ischemia and anaerobic
metabolism is documented. These abnormalities in myocardial metabolism
and blood flow are reversed by successful myectomy. In addition,
SAM causes mitral regurgitation, in which the functional deformation
of the mitral valve causes incomplete coaptation.
Treatment is often tailored to whether or not a patient has obstruction
or not. This dichotomy suffers from a gray zone: patients with a
provocable gradient. Provocation with amyl nitrite, exercise or
the post-prandial state may transfer a patient previously catalogued
as not obstructed to obstructed.
Cause of systolic anterior motion
Systolic anterior motion (SAM) is the usual mechanism for outflow
of obstruction in HCM. Obstructed patients have anatomic features
that predispose them to systolic mitral-septal contact. Their mitral
valve leaflets are relatively large with increased leaflet area
found in 60% of valves removed at surgery or necropsy (5). Residual
portions of leaflets extend past the coaptation point and protrude
into the outflow tract (6). Most importantly, the mitral valve is
situated anteriorly in the left ventricular cavity (7). This is
due to anterior displacement of the papillary muscles, a small left
ventricle and a bulging septum. The anterior displacement puts the
mitral valve into the flow stream of left ventricular ejection,
subjecting the mitral valve to the hemodynamic force of ejection
flow.
There is agreement that that SAM is caused by the action of left
ventricular flow on the protruding mitral valve leaflet (2). Initially,
investigators hypothesized that anterior motion is caused by a Venturi
mechanism, whereby high velocity flow in the outflow tract lifts
the mitral valve towards the septum. More recent data has shown
that drag, the pushing force of flow, initiates the anterior motion
by pushing the protruding mitral leaflet into the septum (7-8).
Drag is the component of force on a body that is in the direction
of the flow - examples are the familiar force of rushing water or
the wind. The mitral valve is swept by the pushing force of flow
into the septum (8).
After this, the pressure gradient across the protruding mitral
leaflet further narrows the orifice, initiating an amplifying feedback
loop in which obstruction begets more obstruction. SAM is best described
as a flow drag triggered, time dependent, amplifying feedback loop
(8).
Pharmacologic treatment of obstructive HCM
Most symptomatic patients with obstructive HCM can be managed successfully
with medication (1-3). Patients are treated first with beta blockade.
Unfortunately, this is often not effective in symptomatic patients
with high resting gradients. However, beta blockade does prevent
the exercise-related rise in gradient. In addition, slowing heart
rate improves filling in patients who have significant diastolic
abnormalities.
Disopyramide is the single most efficacious medication to relieve
obstruction (2, 9-14). It is quite effective in lowering outflow
gradients and improving symptoms, even in patients with high degrees
of resting obstruction. The usual starting dose is 400-600 mg/day,
using the controlled release preparation to allow twice a day dosing.
Disopyramide increases treadmill exercise time (11).
This agent is a potent negative inotrope. In normals it decreases
echocardiographic left ventricular fractional shortening by 28%.
Despite this decrease in ejection, LV end diastolic pressure falls
as well, due to relief of obstruction. A recent study has shown
an improvement in coronary vasodilator reserve in patients with
obstructive HCM, using intracoronary Doppler ultrasound (12). Another
study has examined the effect of disopyramide on the balance of
myocardial oxygen supply and demand in obstructive HCM. After disopyramide,
resting coronary flow velocity, measured with intracoronary Doppler,
was unchanged, while LV external work, from pressure-volume loops,
was decreased indicating an improvement in the supply-demand balance
(13).
Disopyramide levels can be monitored especially in patients with
renal failure. Reduction in gradient has been observed with dosages
and disopyramide levels lower than those needed for antiarrhythmic
therapy (10). Vagolytic side effects, dry mouth and exacerbation
of prostatism can limit disopyramide dose. Disopyramide should not
be started in patients with prostatism or in patients with impaired
global systolic function. We have not observed pro-arrhythmic ventricular
tachycardia using disopyramide for obstructive HCM, nor has it been
reported in the literature. Disopyramide is most often used in combination
with a beta-blocker; beta blockade offers the advantage of slowing
the exercise heart rate, and decreasing sympathetic mediated increase
in gradient.
NEXT PAGE
|